Language selection

Search

Transboundary Pacific salmon integrated fisheries management plan summary

Full text of Transboundary Pacific salmon integrated fisheries management plan(PDF, 3.7 MB)

The IFMP covers fisheries in the Alsek, Stikine, and Taku River watersheds (Transboundary Rivers)

As of 2021

On this page

Forward

The purpose of this Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP) summary is to provide a brief overview of the information found in the full IFMP. This document also serves to communicate the basic information on the fishery and its management to DFO staff, legislated co-management boards and other stakeholders.  This IFMP provides a common understanding of the basic “rules” for the sustainable management of the fisheries resource. The full IFMP is available on request.

This IFMP summary is not a legally binding instrument which can form the basis of a legal challenge. The IFMP can be modified at any time and does not fetter the Minister's discretionary powers set out in the Fisheries Act. The Minister can, for reasons of conservation or for any other valid reasons, modify any provision of the IFMP in accordance with the powers granted pursuant to the Fisheries Act

Where DFO is responsible for implementing obligations under land claims agreements, the IFMP will be implemented in a manner consistent with these obligations.  In the event that an IFMP is inconsistent with obligations under land claims agreements, the provisions of the land claims agreements will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency. 

The electronic version of the entire IFMP can be found in our online library.

General overview/introduction, including map

This 2021/2022 Transboundary Salmon Integrated Fisheries Management Plan (IFMP) covers the period April  1, 2021 to March 31, 2022.

The IFMP provides a broad context to the management of the Pacific salmon fishery and the interrelationships of all fishing sectors involved in this fishery. 

This IFMP covers fisheries originating in the three principal Pacific drainages, Transboundary rivers originating in northwestern British Columbia and southwest Yukon, namely the Alsek, Stikine and Taku rivers. (Figures 12, 17 and 22).  Appendices 1 to 3 of this IFMP provide the specific integrated fishing plans for each of the Transboundary river systems in addition to providing other information such as run outlooks, spawning escapement goals, decision guidelines and a post season review.

Map of the Alsek river
Figure 12 – The Alsek River and principal Canadian fishing areas.
Map of the Stikine river
Figure 17 – The Stikine and Canadian fishing areas.
Map of the Taku river watershed
Figure 22 – The Taku River watershed and the Canadian commercial fishing area.

Stock assessment, science & traditional ecological knowledge

Biology

Pacific salmon include five species belonging to the genus Oncorhynchus family Salmonidae: Pink (O. gorbuscha), Chum (O. keta), Sockeye (O. nerka), Coho (O. kisutch) and Chinook (O. tshawytscha). The native range of Pacific Salmon includes the north Pacific Ocean, Bering Strait, south-western Beaufort Sea and surrounding fresh waters. They occur in an estimated 1300-1500 rivers and streams in BC and Yukon; notably, the Skeena and Nass Rivers in the north and the Fraser River in the south historically accounted for approximately 75% of the total salmon numbers.

Pacific salmon complete their life cycle by returning to their natal stream to spawn, in many cases to the particular gravel bed where they were hatched.  Homing of Pacific salmon to their natal stream is an important biological characteristic of salmon stocks. Each stock is genetically adapted to the environment in which it resides, and exhibits unique characteristics such as life history, migration route, migration timing, and productivity.  Sockeye and Chinook travel the farthest upstream to spawn, as far as 1,500 kilometers.  Chum, Coho and Pink usually spawn closer to the sea.

The numbers of Pacific salmon returning to BC waters varies greatly from year to year and decade to decade, often with pronounced population cycles.  For example, many Sockeye salmon populations are very abundant every third or fourth year.  This is seen most dramatically in the Fraser River, where the abundance of some populations in abundant years is many times larger than that of other years.  Longer term cycles are also apparent but less regular and seem to be associated with changes in ocean conditions that affect survival during the feeding migration.

Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS)

Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) are cumulative and gathered over generations by First Nation, Métis or Inuit individuals and communities, which encompass regional, local and spiritual connections to ecosystems and all forms of plant and animal life. Indigenous Knowledge (IK) has also been referred to, at times, as Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK). IKS is holistic and viewed in terms of the interconnectedness of whole systems.  While qualitatively different both are cumulative knowledge gathered over generations and are regionally and locally specific.  Both forms of knowledge can often be utilized to improve the management process.The growing awareness of the value of IKS is reflected in the increasing requirements for it to be included in environmental assessments, co-management arrangements, species at risk recovery plans, and all coastal management decision-making processes.  Both are needed to inform and fill knowledge gaps related to the health of salmon stocks and to aid decision making related to development and resource use.  Government and the scientific community acknowledge the need to access and consider IKS in meaningful and respectful ways.  However, the challenge for resource managers is how to engage knowledge holders and how to ensure that the information can be accessed and considered in a mutually acceptable manner, by both knowledge holders, and the broader community of First Nations, stakeholders, managers, and policy makers involved in the fisheries.

Stock assessment

Salmon stock assessment is primarily concerned with providing scientific information for conservation and management of salmon resources.  Stock assessment describes the past and present status of salmon stocks and forecasts future status of stocks under different scenarios.  Stock assessment programs contribute information to the fisheries management process, from the initial setting of objectives (and policies) to providing expert advice in the implementation of management plans.  Stock assessment information also supports First Nation and Treaty obligations, integrated ocean management planning, development of marine protected areas, protection and recovery of species at risk, and international Treaty obligations and negotiations. 

External partners and clients play an increasing role in delivery of the stock assessment activities.  Some First Nations, recreational and commercial harvesters contribute directly through data collection and reporting.  First Nations and community groups conduct field data collection projects.  Universities and non-government organizations (NGOs) are active in the analytical and peer review elements.  Stock assessment staff collaborates with other regional, national and international organizations and conduct numerous cooperative and/or joint programs. 

Section 2 outlines the salmon ecosystem overview and interactions.

Stewardship, co-management, consultation, and advisory boards

As outlined in Section 3, in Pacific Region, DFO consults with and engages First Nations and other interests through a wide range of processes. For salmon, the focal point for DFO’s engagement with First Nations, the harvest sectors and environmental interests is around the development and implementation of the annual IFMP. At a broad, Province-wide level, the Integrated Harvest Planning Committee (IHPC) brings together First Nations, commercial and recreational harvesters, and environmental interests to review and provide input on the draft IFMP, as well as coordinate fishing plans and (where possible) resolve potential issues between the sectors.

The Department undertakes consultations with First Nations organizations and groups through a variety of processes, such as the Forum on Conservation and Harvest Planning, to facilitate dialogue between First Nations and DFO. Engagement between DFO and First Nations also takes place through a number of bilateral and “integrated” (multi-interest) advisory processes, management boards, technical groups and roundtable forums.

In addition to integrated dialogue through the IHPC, the Department also works directly with the commercial and recreational sectors, largely through the Commercial Salmon Advisory Board (CSAB) and Sport Fishing Advisory Board (SFAB), respectively.  The Department also officially consults with the Marine Conservation Caucus, an umbrella group representing eight core environmental groups.

Economic, Social, Cultural Importance

Section 4 of the IFMP provides a socio-economic overview of the salmon fishery in British Columbia.  In future years, information on the social and cultural context of the various fisheries can be added, where available.  This section addresses salmon in the context of the Aboriginal food, social, and ceremonial fishery, the Aboriginal communal commercial fishery, the recreational and commercial fishing sectors, the processing sector and the export market.  DFO recognizes the unique values of each of the fisheries described here.  The overview provided in this profile is intended to help build a common understanding of the socio-economic dimensions of each fishery rather than compare the fisheries. Where possible this summary highlights information specific to the Transboundary Rivers.

Management issues

Departmental policy development related to the management of fisheries is guided by a range of considerations that include legislated mandates, judicial guidance, and international and domestic commitments that promote biodiversity and a precautionary, ecosystem-based approach to the management of marine resources.  Section 1.6 outlines the policies that were developed with considerable consultation from those with an interest in salmon management.  While the policies themselves are not subject to annual changes, implementation details are continually refined as appropriate.

Please see the salmon consultation website for more information.

Fishery management objectives for stocks of concern

Section 6 of the IFMP outlines the fishery management objectives for stocks of concern.  The decision guidelines, specific management measures for each fishery and specific fishing plans are described in  Appendices 1 (Alsek River), 2 (Stikine River), and 3 (Taku River).

General decision guidelines, access and allocations

The Minister can, for reasons of conservation or for any other any other valid reasons, modify access, allocations and sharing arrangements outlined in this IFMP in accordance with the powers granted pursuant to the Fisheries Act.

International

Details can be found at the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) website.

Allocation guidelines

An Allocation Policy for Pacific Salmon can be found on-line in our library.

Allocation decisions are made in accordance with the Allocation Policy for Pacific Salmon.
Figure 2 below describes a generalized framework by which fishing opportunities are allocated to different fishing sectors at different abundance levels.

Figure 2: Allocation guidelines

Low abundance High abundance
First Nations FSC Non-retention / closed By-catch
Retention
Directed Directed Directed
Recreational Non-retention / closed Non-retention By-catch
Retention
Directed Directed
Commercial Non-retention / closed Non-retention By-catch
Retention
By-catch
Retention
Directed

Note: This table describes conceptually how First Nations, recreational and commercial fisheries might be undertaken across a range of returns. It does not imply that specific management actions for all stocks exactly follow these guidelines, but rather is an attempt to depict the broad approach.

The allocation guidelines above refer to directed fisheries on a species.  The application of the Allocation Policy for Pacific Salmon on non-target stocks is case specific.  The inadvertent harvest of different species of concern is referred to as by-catch.  The inadvertent harvest of stocks of concern within the same species (i.e. Cultus Lake Sockeye when harvesting Summer Run Sockeye) is referred to as incidental harvest.  Both by-catch and incidental harvest are factored into the calculation of exploitation rates on various stocks, and therefore, fishing plans are designed to be consistent with existing policies and to keep exploitation rates on stocks of concern within the limits described in the fishery management objectives.
All harvest groups have recommended that the Department consult on by-catch/incidental harvest allocations.  However, the Department does not generally allocate by-catch or portions of the acceptable exploitation rate on stocks of concern.  The Department considers a number of fishing plan options and attempts to address a range of objectives including minimizing by-catch and incidental catch.
Section 7 of the IFMP outlines the detailed information on the First Nation, Recreational and Commercial fisheries.

Compliance plan

Specific objectives for the salmon fishery will be to focus compliance management efforts on:

As outlined in Section 8, salmon fishery compliance continues to be a priority for C&P.  There are, however, other competing priorities such as habitat management, the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program, and the protection of Species at Risk.
In order to balance multiple program demands, C&P applies a risk-based integrated work planning process at the Regional and Area levels. This process ensures that resources are allocated appropriately. Resource utilization is dependent on availability of program funding.

Performance/evaluation criteria

Section 9 is intended to outline measurable indicators to determine whether or not those management issues outlined in IFMP are being addressed. These indicators may include those specifically developed for the IFMP, as well as, from existing evaluation processes.

Date modified: